by Angrist
IirionClaus wrote:
Angrist wrote:
It's true, but I had 8 agendas in my deck vs. 35 non-agenda cards ...
I'm guessing you meant 9 Agendas...
I was referring to the cards left in my deck, since I had one agenda in hand there were 8 left in HQ. Likewise with the non-agenda cards - I had 2 ice installed and 3 non-agendas in my hand. 49 card deck - the 6 cards in play or in hand, one of which is an agenda = 43 - 8 agendas remaining = 35 non agenda cards left in HQ. I'm pretty sure I counted it right.
IirionClaus wrote:
Angrist wrote:
I know, but I think I was annoyed at the delay it took the last time I submitted a session report. It took quite a few hours before it got approved, whereas if you post something in general it gets posted straight away.
It's peer reviewed when submitted to Sessions. The social norm at BGG is to submit threads to the appropriate forum.
K, well it can always be moved.
argus88 wrote:
I personally wasn't running Data Mine in my deck (lack of space somewhat), although I want to - apparently it's good with Chum in front of it. I also want to run Neural EMP but there isn't really space for that either.
That was my reasoning at the time for running Data Mine. However, it means you need an ICE, Data Mine and then Chum (so the Chum is above something when Data Mine blows up). Furthermore, the combo becomes obsolete when your opponent can break Chum. Hence my decision to dispose of Data Mine.
(And Neural EMP was always a dead draw when I got it)
Yeah...