by the pete
Butaman551 wrote:
Well, you are definitely missing something, but that is entirely my fault. I had actually asked him two questions, and he answered both in the same reply. Now that you mention it, I can see how that could cause some confusion. So as requested, here is the question(s) I asked him as well as the response one more time.
Thanks, that definitely clears it up! Unfortunately that now puts me in the "Holy crap, was that unintuitive" camp. I would have bet good money that the ruling would have gone the other way.